By, Jay Prag,

When a revolution is driven by perceived, unjust inequality it often features a violent overthrow of a very small upper class by the much larger, (often characterized as) oppressed lower class.

And famously during the French revolution the uprising featured a rather permanent eradication of the upper class: Off with their Heads!

After taking the wealth from the recently decapitated, the newly reconstituted country will have a much more balanced income distribution (assuming the upper-class wealth is redistributed but in any case, without an upper class) and it should be a more tranquil place; economic imbalance has been eliminated. Unfortunately, when you rebalanced your income distribution with the guillotine, you also literally removed the economy’s head. You removed most of the educated people who, like them or not, were the only ones who knew how most things worked. You removed their head and their existing wealth, but left your country with no one who knew how to add to that wealth. (Interestingly, soon after the French revolution, France, under Napoleon, resorted to plan B for economic expansion: invade your neighbors.)

When land and natural resource ownership were the only source of wealth, upward mobility was very difficult. Upper class families owned all of the land and the only way to get it was to inherit it. But the sources of wealth have changed over the past couple of centuries so upward mobility and overall economic fairness has improved dramatically.

It is from this history that we get the logic for things like an estate tax and the recently proposed wealth tax. If someone accumulated wealth beyond a certain point – even if they paid all of their (progressive) income taxes, employed thousands of people, donated to dozens of charities, and were generally well-liked by all – the federal government arbitrarily decides that it has the right to tax away a substantial portion of that person’s estate after they join the French aristocrats in the afterlife. I say arbitrarily because the legitimate economic rationale for an estate tax are nonexistent.

The word that’s usually tossed around to justify an estate tax is “fair.” But the estate tax is a classic example of unfair; it is specifically treating one group differently for no reason other than the fact that they can’t do anything about it – they’re dead. It is what political science people call a tyranny of the majority; a well-known flaw in democracies in which a large group of the population can arbitrarily impose their will on any small group.

As it turns out, democratically elected governments often do things that have mass appeal and only inflict pain on a few. That’s a good way to get re-elected. But aside from the innate unfairness of such policies, there is a fundamental off-with-their-head problem. At any one time, the government can change the rules of the economy and tax away some (or even most) of the money that people were allowed to earn or accumulate. But having done that, you can’t guarantee the money will be there to tax ever again.

Read the full Off With Their Heads! article by, Jay Prag,

Family Enterprise USA is the organization that represents all family businesses on a national level in DC; it is not unique to any industry. Family Enterprise USA is different from other organizations because it represents and advocates for the families of family businesses and the issues, they face running their businesses every day. Our sole mission and purpose is to promote family businesses and their job growth in America. We also support the work of Family Business Centers across the country. We hope your family will choose to be a member of Family Enterprise USA.