{"id":18265,"date":"2026-08-14T14:19:54","date_gmt":"2026-08-14T21:19:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/?p=18265"},"modified":"2026-08-29T14:25:30","modified_gmt":"2026-08-29T21:25:30","slug":"wealth-tax-news-8-14-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/feusa\/wealth-tax-news-8-14-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Wealth Tax News \u2013 8\/14\/2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”4px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.16″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_weight=”2px” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_cta title=”Make Your Voice Heard on Capitol Hill” button_url=”https:\/\/www.congressweb.com\/PTG\/12\/” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Contact your members of Congress now and ask them to stand with family businesses by joining the Caucus.” disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Call To Action Top” _builder_version=”4.27.6″ _module_preset=”default” header_font_size=”22px” background_color=”#397389″ custom_button=”on” button_bg_color=”#ff0019″ custom_margin=”-17px|||||” custom_padding=”16px||19px|||” global_module=”9695″ saved_tabs=”all” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_cta][et_pb_video src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=9hWIUCjW1LI” disabled_on=”on|on|on” _builder_version=”4.27.6″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_video][et_pb_text admin_label=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.7″ text_font=”||||||||” text_font_size=”16px” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

This week\u2019s wealth tax developments centered on California\u2019s Proposition 40, which faced constitutional scrutiny from the Tax Foundation and over $100 million in opposition spending led by Sergey Brin.\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n

\u00a0<\/h3>\n

At the federal level, DSA leadership endorsed aggressive wealth taxation without specifying rates or thresholds, and Oregon\u2019s two U.S. senators continued advancing competing proposals to tax unrealized gains and high-net-worth households.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In New York, Mayor Mamdani\u2019s pied-\u00e0-terre tax encountered administrative complexity and litigation, while an Australian academic argued that billionaire-specific levies are less effective than systemic reform to tax all forms of wealth consistently.<\/strong><\/em><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Please find summaries of relevant articles with web links below.<\/strong> Please reach out to any member of your Brownstein National Tax Policy Group team with questions or to set up a meeting.<\/a><\/p>\n

California Wealth Tax Initiative 2026: Latest Polls – The New York Times<\/a>
The New York Times has set up a page on their website tracking recent polling on the California wealth tax proposal.<\/p>\n

Federal<\/strong><\/h4>\n

RNC warns socialists push Democrats \u2018off cliff\u2019 after DSA co-chair offers no tax rate<\/a>
Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) co-chair Megan Romer endorsed aggressively taxing millionaires and billionaires but could not provide a specific tax rate, income cutoff, or wealth threshold when pressed by\u00a0The New Yorker<\/em>\u2019s David Remnick. Romer said tax policy should instead be based on public spending needs and the revenue required to meet them. The DSA\u2019s 2026 program similarly calls for \u201caggressive wealth taxes\u201d without defining their scope. The RNC used the exchange to argue that socialist influence could harm Democratic candidates, while centrist group Third Way announced a $15 million effort to counter the DSA\u2019s political influence following several primary victories by DSA-backed or progressive candidates.<\/p>\n

Editorial: Oregon\u2019s senators lead \u2018tax the rich\u2019 plans | Your Oregon News<\/a>
The editorial argues that although wealthy households may face lower effective tax rates because the tax system primarily targets income rather than accumulated wealth, proposed wealth taxes carry significant practical risks. It highlights an Oregon would-be ballot measure for a 2% tax on assets above $30 million, Sen. Ron Wyden\u2019s (D) proposal to tax certain unrealized stock gains of the wealthiest Americans, and Sen. Jeff Merkley\u2019s (D) proposed annual 2% tax on wealth above $50 million, rising to 3 percent above $1 billion. While these plans appeal because they would affect relatively few taxpayers, the editorial warns they could encourage asset relocation or concealment and reduce public trading of businesses, potentially producing outcomes different from proponents\u2019 goals.<\/p>\n

California<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Sergey Brin Crosses $100 Million in Spending to Fight Wealth Tax – Bloomberg<\/a>
Google co-founder Sergey Brin has contributed $102 million to Building a Better California, including a recent $20 million donation, making him the leading funder of efforts to defeat California\u2019s Proposition 40. Brin-backed groups are financing two competing ballot measures that could invalidate it if they receive more votes. Supporters of the tax have raised just over $30 million, and Brin\u2014who has also established Nevada residency\u2014has helped mobilize other technology billionaires against the proposal.<\/p>\n

California Proposition 40: Is CA Wealth Tax Constitutional? \u2013 Tax Foundation<\/a>
Supplementing its prior analyses, Tax Foundation argues that California\u2019s Proposition 40 has substantial constitutional vulnerabilities that could invalidate it in whole or in part. The analysis argues that labeling the proposed tax as an excise tax cannot avoid state limits on property taxation. The analysis also highlights that its retroactive residency trigger, full tax of wealth measured after taxpayers may have left the state, and treatment of trusts and nonresident spouses raise due process, Commerce Clause, apportionment, and right-to-travel concerns; and that including federal obligations and imposing uncapped appraiser penalties create additional legal problems. Because these defects affect the tax\u2019s basic design, the report concludes that judicial reformation is unlikely to cure them and predicts extensive litigation if voters approve the measure.<\/p>\n

California billionaire tax\u2019s chief backer: \u2018This is now a national campaign\u2019 – POLITICO<\/a>
SEIU-UHW President Dave Regan characterized Prop 40 wealth tax as part of a broader national campaign to tax wealth \u201choarded outside of the tax system.\u201d Despite early opposition from Gov. Gavin Newsom, labor and health care groups, and a billionaire- and tech-backed coalition supporting competing measures, the proposal has gained endorsements from the California Democratic Party and California Federation of Labor Unions. Regan rejected arguments that the tax would cause billionaires to leave the state and said he would welcome additional backing, including from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.<\/p>\n

Opinion: Why flawed wealth tax could backfire on California \u2013 San Diego Union-Tribune<\/a>
Jared Walczak, a senior fellow at the Tax Foundation, argues that Prop 40 could backfire because its residency and valuation rules are vulnerable to legal challenge. By taxing individuals who were California residents on January 1, 2026, based on wealth measured at year-end, even if they move away during the year, the measure may constitute an unconstitutional retroactive \u201cwholly new tax,\u201d violate due process requirements for a connection between California and the taxed wealth, and fail fair-apportionment standards. Walczak also noted that courts may be unwilling to rewrite the measure\u2019s core provisions, creating an incentive for billionaires to leave before enactment and potentially costing California ongoing income-tax revenue without generating the anticipated wealth-tax proceeds.<\/p>\n

New York<\/strong><\/h4>\n

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s luxury second home tax is getting complicated – AP News<\/a>
New York City\u2019s new pied-\u00e0-terre tax, championed by Mayor Mamdani, is facing administrative and legal hurdles. The surcharge would apply to high-value homes that are not owners\u2019 primary residences, but trusts, LLCs, rental arrangements, and informal family occupancy make determining residency and ownership difficult. Wealthy homeowners have criticized the disclosure of potentially taxable properties and challenged the rollout in court; although a judge temporarily paused the process, the city\u2019s appeal has allowed implementation efforts to continue.<\/p>\n

Other<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Calls to tax billionaires are growing. Is there a better way to tax the rich? \u2013 The Conversation<\/a>
The debate over taxing billionaires reflects a broader problem: Australia taxes wages, savings, property, and wealth inconsistently. High-net-worth individuals often accumulate wealth through unrealized capital gains, which generally are not taxed until assets are sold, allowing wealth to grow with tax deferred\u2014unlike wages, which are taxed as earned. While a billionaire wealth tax or annual tax on unrealized gains could address this disparity, valuation and volatility create practical challenges. The author contends that Australia should focus on a more coherent tax system across all forms of wealth, including property and savings, rather than rely solely on a billionaire-specific levy.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_cta title=”Want to learn more?” button_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/polling-and-research\/wealth-tax\/” button_text=”Visit our State and Federal Wealth Tax Tracker – Click Here ” admin_label=”State and Federal Wealth Tax Tracker CTA” _builder_version=”4.27.6″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#fc2f36″ custom_padding=”13px||18px|||” global_module=”17129″ global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_cta][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”off|off|off” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Logo & About” _builder_version=”4.22.1″ text_font=”||||||||” text_font_size=”16px” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/www.bhfs.com\/” link_option_url_new_window=”on” border_color_all=”#FFFFFF” border_style_all=”none” global_module=”6751″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

About Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
<\/strong>Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck is a unique law firm. Walk into any of our offices and you\u2019ll immediately recognize a different type of energy. Complacency doesn\u2019t have a place here. Flexibility and inspiration do.\u00a0Our culture and enthusiasm allow our attorneys, policy consultants and legal staff to stay ahead of our clients\u2019 needs and provide them with the resources they require to meet their business objectives.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”off|off|off” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Become a member text” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate-2\/” global_module=”5822″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

We hope you’ve enjoyed this article. While you’re here, we have a small favor to ask…<\/em><\/h4>\n

As we prepare for what promises to be a pivotal year for America, we’re asking you to consider becoming a member.<\/p>\n

The need for fact-based reporting of issues important to family owned businesses<\/a> and protecting a lifetime of savings<\/a> has never been greater. Now more than ever, successful families<\/a> and family owned businesses<\/a> are under fire. That’s why Family Enterprise USA<\/a> is passionately working to increase the awareness of issues important to family owned businesses<\/a> built on hard work, while continuing to strengthen our presence on Capitol Hill. The issues we fight for or against with Congress in Washington DC include high income tax rates<\/a>, possible elimination of valuation discounts, increase in capital gains tax<\/a>, enactment of a wealth tax<\/a>, and the continued burden of the gift tax<\/a>, estate tax<\/a> and generation skipping tax<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_button button_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate\/” button_text=”Become a Family Enterprise USA Member” button_alignment=”center” disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Become FEUSA member button” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” global_module=”6503″ global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_button][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_style=”dotted” divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”on|on|on” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_video_slider disabled_on=”on|on|on” admin_label=”Video Slider Family Business Stories 2″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_module=”6670″ global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=y9VszpRjVDM” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=03T2VODneEg” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fHIxWaTwK64″ _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=TI7P07GbNdU&t=27s” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][\/et_pb_video_slider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”FEUSA Statement” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate-2\/” global_module=”5910″ saved_tabs=”all” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

\n

Family Enterprise USA<\/a> promotes generationally<\/a> owned family business<\/a> creation, growth, viability, and sustainability by advocating for family businesses<\/a> and their lifetime of savings with Congress<\/a> in Washington DC.\u00a0 Since 2007, Family Enterprise USA<\/a> has represented and celebrated\u00a0all sizes, professions and industries of family-owned enterprises and multi-generational<\/a> employers. It is a bi-partisan 501.c3 organization.\u00a0Family foundations can donate.<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text disabled_on=”on|on|on” admin_label=”Hash tags & Tags” _builder_version=”4.27.6″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_module=”6498″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

#incometax #CapitalGainsTax #R&DExpensing #DontPunishSuccess #GrantorTrusts #StepUpinBasis #likeKindExchanges #AcceleratedDepreciation #EstateTax #Deathtax #wealthtax #taxLegislation #CongressionalCaucus #incometaxrates #repealestatetax #AdvocatingForFamilyBusinesses #FamilyOwnedBusiness #WomenOwnedBusiness @FamilyEnterpriseUSA #FamilyEnterpriseUSA #FEUSA<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This week\u2019s wealth tax developments centered on California\u2019s Proposition 40, which faced constitutional scrutiny from the Tax Foundation and over $100 million in opposition spending led by Sergey Brin.\u00a0 \u00a0 At the federal level, DSA leadership endorsed aggressive wealth taxation without specifying rates or thresholds, and Oregon\u2019s two U.S. senators continued advancing competing proposals to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":18271,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[48,3,92,115],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-family-businesses","category-feusa","category-multi-generational-business","category-wealth-tax"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18265"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18272,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18265\/revisions\/18272"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}