<\/p>\n
Supporters point to backfilling federal healthcare cuts and rising public frustration with inequality, while opponents\u2014including billionaires funding over $129 million in opposition spending, Governor Newsom, and commentators at the WSJ, Forbes, and the Cato Institute \u2013 warn of capital flight, residency audits, legal challenges, and long-term harm to innovation and younger generations. With several of these measures headed to voters or courts this fall, the coming months will be a real-world test of whether wealth taxes can survive practical, legal, and political scrutiny.<\/strong><\/em><\/h3>\n <\/p>\n
Please find summaries of relevant articles with web links below.<\/strong> Please reach out to any member of your Brownstein National Tax Policy Group team with questions or to set up a meeting.<\/a><\/p>\nCalifornia Wealth Tax Initiative 2026: Latest Polls – The New York Times<\/a>
The New York Times has set up a page on their website tracking recent polling on the California wealth tax proposal.<\/p>\nFederal<\/strong><\/h4>\nThe left sees a billionaire backlash \u2014 and an opening for a wealth tax – The Washington Post<\/a>
Dan Merica reports that growing public frustration with extreme wealth, highlighted by high-profile billionaires and rising inequality, is creating new political momentum for a federal wealth tax among progressives. Advocacy groups and some Democrats are pushing proposals like a \u201cFive & Dime\u201d tax on high-net-worth households, arguing it could raise significant revenue and address disparities in how the wealthy are taxed. Polling from the Pew Research Center suggests broad concern that wealthy individuals do not pay their fair share, though the idea still faces practical, legal, and political obstacles.<\/p>\nCalifornia<\/strong><\/h4>\nChamath Palihapitiya on CA wealth tax proposal: We’re better off addressing the core problem – CNBC<\/a>
In an interview with CNBC, Palihapitiya (founder and CEO of Social Capital) argued that California\u2019s wealth tax proposal would be ultimately harmful to economic activity and may eventually morph into a tax on Californians who are significantly less wealthy. He argues the tax may be a response to broader underlying issues such as ineffective governance and a general sense among many people that there is no meaningful path to financial success in the current economy. He noted that he will be staying in California and paying the tax if it takes effect.<\/p>\nBillionaires who fled California wealth tax risk intrusive residency audit \u2013 Financial Times<\/a>
California\u2019s proposed wealth tax on the paper wealth of billionaires resident as of January 1, 2026 is prompting wealthy tech figures to claim they\u2019ve left the state, but they now face aggressive residency audits to test those claims. Sergey Brin, David Sacks, and Travis Kalanick all say they relocated shortly before the effective date, but advisers warn California\u2019s tax authorities will scrutinize not just days spent in\u2011state but property, family, and financial ties to argue they remain residents. Supporters expect the tax to raise about $100 billion to backfill federal healthcare cuts and are confident few billionaires truly severed connections in the brief window, while affected billionaires are funding competing ballot measures, organizing campaigns against the tax, and preparing constitutional and residency lawsuits that could drag on for years.<\/p>\nA wealth tax in America? Not if Silicon Valley\u2019s billionaires have their way \u2013 Financial Times<\/a>
California\u2019s proposed wealth tax highlights a major clash between populist anger at extreme wealth and organized opposition from Silicon Valley billionaires, led by Sergey Brin. Together, they have collectively committed at least $129 million to defeat the measure and placed spoiler initiatives on the ballot that could block any wealth tax. Supporters, including economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, see the tax as a first step toward limiting \u201coligarchic drift.\u201d Opponents, including Michael Moritz, Chamath Palihapitiya, and Governor Gavin Newsom, warn it will accelerate capital flight, invite repeat and broader wealth taxes, and deepen a rift within California\u2019s Democratic establishment.<\/p>\nMore States Want to Tax the Rich. Here’s How. WSJ Podcasts<\/a>
Alex Ossola and Jeanne Whalen\u00a0discuss the growing wave of state-level efforts to tax wealthy Americans, focusing on California\u2019s proposal. While supporters, including labor groups, argue the tax is necessary and popular amid rising concern over inequality, it faces significant opposition from business leaders, policymakers, and even some Democrats who warn of capital flight, legal challenges, and design flaws. The broader trend shows states more commonly pursuing high-income taxes rather than wealth taxes, with mixed evidence on economic impacts, while policymakers increasingly debate whether federal reforms are needed to address structural issues like tax avoidance strategies used by wealthy individuals.<\/p>\nHunting the billionaires risks killing Silicon Valley \u2013 New York Post<\/a>
The California Post Editorial Board argues that the state\u2019s proposed wealth tax risks driving away wealthy innovators and undermining Silicon Valley\u2019s economic engine. The Board criticizes efforts to audit individuals who have left the state as overly aggressive and suggests the policy will discourage investment, entrepreneurship, and job creation while doing little to solve underlying fiscal issues like rising healthcare costs.<\/p>\nThe Billionaire Tax Is A Retirement-Security Measure \u2013 Forbes<\/a>
Teresa Ghilarducci argues that California\u2019s proposed wealth tax is fundamentally a retirement\u2011security measure because it is designed to backfill Medi\u2011Cal funding lost under federal tax cuts, protecting Medicaid\u2019s role as the de facto long\u2011term\u2011care insurer for middle\u2011class retirees. She contrasts it with Proposition 42, branded as the \u201cRetirement and Personal Savings Protection Act,\u201d which would block new taxes on the types of assets billionaires hold and could kill the Billionaire Tax if both pass and Prop 42 receives more yes votes. She called Prop 42 a \u201cpoison pill\u201d that shields extreme wealth while threatening long\u2011term\u2011care financing.<\/p>\nNew York<\/strong><\/h4>\nNYC New Property Tax Blasted as a \u2018Half-Baked Money Grab\u2019 – Bloomberg<\/a>
New York City\u2019s new tax on luxury second homes (the pied\u2011\u00e0\u2011terre tax) is being rolled out quickly to raise about $500 million, but real estate lawyers and industry groups say the rules are confusing and unfair. They argue the bare\u2011bones regulations leave major gray areas around residency proof, temporary vacancies, trusts, co\u2011op ownership, and tenant status, and worry co\u2011op buildings could be on the hook if individual owners don\u2019t pay. The tax will initially use different rates and valuation thresholds for houses versus co\u2011ops and condos, then shift after 2028 to a unified system for second homes valued at $5 million or more, but opponents say owners still lack clarity on how values will be set or how exemptions will work.<\/p>\nWashington<\/strong><\/h4>\nWashington Millionaires Tax Repeal Bid Heads for State Ballot – Bloomberg Law<\/a>
Washington millionaire tax is now facing a likely repeal vote in November after a repeal initiative led by Brian Heywood\u2019s Let\u2019s Go Washington met the signature threshold. The tax, slated to take effect in 2028 and first due in 2029, is projected to apply to about 20,000 households and raise more than $3 billion per year starting in 2029. Supporters say it targets a small slice of top earners to fund state needs. Opponents argue it will hurt Washington\u2019s economic competitiveness and pave the way for a broader income tax, and they are also pursuing legal challenges claiming the levy is an illegal property tax.<\/p>\nOpponents argue millionaires tax repeal will strip K-12 funding \u2013 KOMO News<\/a>
Opponents of Washington state\u2019s millionaire tax repeal, including Gov. Bob Ferguson (D) and legislative leaders, argue that scrapping the income tax while leaving new sales tax exemptions for items like diapers and hygiene products in place would severely impact in the budget and force \u201cdevastating\u201d K\u201112 cuts or other tax hikes. Brian Heywood counters that the problem is overspending rather than revenue and warns the tax will eventually be extended below the $1 million threshold to hit pensions and ordinary earners, while supporters insist there is no political support to broaden it beyond true million\u2011dollar incomes.<\/p>\nRhode Island<\/strong><\/h4>\n\u2018Taylor Swift Tax\u2019 Won\u2019t Hit Just the Kelces – WSJ<\/a>
James Freeman argued that Rhode Island\u2019s new \u201cTaylor Swift tax\u201d on high-value second homes will affect a broader group of residents and contribute to an already rising tax burden on the middle class. He said the policy, along with other tax increases such as higher gas taxes, real estate fees, and a new top income tax rate, reflects a broader approach that risks driving away investment and residents.<\/p>\nPennsylvania<\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\nOpinion: Wealth tax would help meet Lehigh County’s financial need fairly \u2013 The Morning Call<\/a>
Ettore Angelo argues that Controller Mark Pinsley\u2019s proposed intangible \u201cwealth tax\u201d in Lehigh County is a fair way to shift some of the county\u2019s financial burden from low\u2011wealth households to residents with substantial stock and other asset holdings. He criticized \u201ctrickle\u2011down\u201d economics and describes the hearing over the proposal as heated, but says the core question is whether struggling families or affluent asset\u2011owners should bear higher taxes as revenue shortfalls grow. Citing large gains in national wealth concentrated among the top 1%, Angelo argues that the U.S. has already experienced massive upward redistribution of wealth and that modest taxes on the rich are a necessary step toward reversing dangerous inequality, especially child poverty.<\/p>\nOther<\/strong><\/h4>\nWealth Taxes Would Hit the Young Hardest – WSJ<\/a>
Dimitri Burshtein argues that wealth taxes, while gaining political traction, would ultimately harm younger generations by reducing capital investment needed for productivity and wage growth. He frames these proposals as a response to demographic pressures, aging populations and fewer workers supporting more retirees, which are straining public finances and driving governments to seek new revenue sources. Drawing on international experience, he argued thar wealth taxes often lead to capital flight and disappointing revenues, while undermining long-term economic growth. Instead, he advocates structural reforms such as adjusting retirement systems and favoring consumption-based taxes, warning that wealth taxes shift fiscal burdens onto younger and future generations while weakening the economic foundation they depend on.<\/p>\nUltrawealthy Seek Citizenship Abroad As Wealth Taxes Gain Traction – Business Insider<\/a>
As wealth taxes gain momentum in the US, wealthy Americans are increasingly treating foreign citizenship and residency as an insurance policy against future tax increases. The article notes that California\u2019s wealth tax proposal has already prompted some to shift assets or relocate. Others are seeking \u201cgolden passports\u201d or visas by making large investments abroad. Advisors such as David Lesperance say clients first pursue lineage-based citizenship in countries where they have ancestral ties, with second or third passports providing optional escape routes even if they never ultimately leave the US.<\/p>\nOpinion | Socialists think billionaires steal wealth – The Washington Post<\/a>
Marian Tupy, a fellow at the CATO Institute, argued that socialist critiques of billionaires rely on an outdated belief that wealth is \u201ctaken\u201d rather than created. He argued that billionaires generate wealth by organizing resources in ways that benefit consumers, workers, and society, and that profits reflect this value creation rather than exploitation. Tupy warns that wealth taxes would discourage innovation, prompt capital flight, and reduce economic growth. He said that taxing billionaire wealth would ultimately harm the broader public by diminishing incentives to create new businesses, technologies, and jobs.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_cta title=”Want to learn more?” button_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/polling-and-research\/wealth-tax\/” button_text=”Visit our State and Federal Wealth Tax Tracker – Click Here ” admin_label=”State and Federal Wealth Tax Tracker CTA” _builder_version=”4.27.6″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#fc2f36″ custom_padding=”13px||18px|||” global_module=”17129″ global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_cta][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”off|off|off” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Logo & About” _builder_version=”4.22.1″ text_font=”||||||||” text_font_size=”16px” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/www.bhfs.com\/” link_option_url_new_window=”on” border_color_all=”#FFFFFF” border_style_all=”none” global_module=”6751″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/brownstein-logo-positive-RGB.png\" "\\"\\"")
<\/p>\n
About Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
<\/strong>Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck is a unique law firm. Walk into any of our offices and you\u2019ll immediately recognize a different type of energy. Complacency doesn\u2019t have a place here. Flexibility and inspiration do.\u00a0Our culture and enthusiasm allow our attorneys, policy consultants and legal staff to stay ahead of our clients\u2019 needs and provide them with the resources they require to meet their business objectives.<\/p>\n[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”off|off|off” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Become a member text” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate-2\/” global_module=”5822″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
We hope you’ve enjoyed this article. While you’re here, we have a small favor to ask…<\/em><\/h4>\nAs we prepare for what promises to be a pivotal year for America, we’re asking you to consider becoming a member.<\/p>\n
The need for fact-based reporting of issues important to family owned businesses<\/a> and protecting a lifetime of savings<\/a> has never been greater. Now more than ever, successful families<\/a> and family owned businesses<\/a> are under fire. That’s why Family Enterprise USA<\/a> is passionately working to increase the awareness of issues important to family owned businesses<\/a> built on hard work, while continuing to strengthen our presence on Capitol Hill. The issues we fight for or against with Congress in Washington DC include high income tax rates<\/a>, possible elimination of valuation discounts, increase in capital gains tax<\/a>, enactment of a wealth tax<\/a>, and the continued burden of the gift tax<\/a>, estate tax<\/a> and generation skipping tax<\/a>.<\/p>\n[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_button button_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate\/” button_text=”Become a Family Enterprise USA Member” button_alignment=”center” disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Become FEUSA member button” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” global_module=”6503″ global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_button][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_style=”dotted” divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”on|on|on” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_video_slider disabled_on=”on|on|on” admin_label=”Video Slider Family Business Stories 2″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_module=”6670″ global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=y9VszpRjVDM” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=03T2VODneEg” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fHIxWaTwK64″ _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=TI7P07GbNdU&t=27s” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][\/et_pb_video_slider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”FEUSA Statement” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate-2\/” global_module=”5910″ saved_tabs=”all” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
\nFamily Enterprise USA<\/a> promotes generationally<\/a> owned family business<\/a> creation, growth, viability, and sustainability by advocating for family businesses<\/a> and their lifetime of savings with Congress<\/a> in Washington DC.\u00a0 Since 2007, Family Enterprise USA<\/a> has represented and celebrated\u00a0all sizes, professions and industries of family-owned enterprises and multi-generational<\/a> employers. It is a bi-partisan 501.c3 organization.\u00a0Family foundations can donate.<\/a><\/p>\n
\n[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text disabled_on=”on|on|on” admin_label=”Hash tags & Tags” _builder_version=”4.27.6″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_module=”6498″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
#incometax #CapitalGainsTax #R&DExpensing #DontPunishSuccess #GrantorTrusts #StepUpinBasis #likeKindExchanges #AcceleratedDepreciation #EstateTax #Deathtax #wealthtax #taxLegislation #CongressionalCaucus #incometaxrates #repealestatetax #AdvocatingForFamilyBusinesses #FamilyOwnedBusiness #WomenOwnedBusiness @FamilyEnterpriseUSA #FamilyEnterpriseUSA #FEUSA<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Momentum for taxing the ultra-wealthy is building at every level of government in the last two weeks \u2013 from a progressive “Five & Dime” push in Congress to California’s high-stakes November ballot fight over a one-time 5% billionaire tax, alongside income-tax battles in Washington State, new luxury-property levies in New York City and Rhode Island, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":17891,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[48,92,115],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-family-businesses","category-multi-generational-business","category-wealth-tax"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17884"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17884\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17892,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17884\/revisions\/17892"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17891"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
California Wealth Tax Initiative 2026: Latest Polls – The New York Times<\/a> The left sees a billionaire backlash \u2014 and an opening for a wealth tax – The Washington Post<\/a> Chamath Palihapitiya on CA wealth tax proposal: We’re better off addressing the core problem – CNBC<\/a> Billionaires who fled California wealth tax risk intrusive residency audit \u2013 Financial Times<\/a> A wealth tax in America? Not if Silicon Valley\u2019s billionaires have their way \u2013 Financial Times<\/a> More States Want to Tax the Rich. Here’s How. WSJ Podcasts<\/a> Hunting the billionaires risks killing Silicon Valley \u2013 New York Post<\/a> The Billionaire Tax Is A Retirement-Security Measure \u2013 Forbes<\/a> NYC New Property Tax Blasted as a \u2018Half-Baked Money Grab\u2019 – Bloomberg<\/a> Washington Millionaires Tax Repeal Bid Heads for State Ballot – Bloomberg Law<\/a> Opponents argue millionaires tax repeal will strip K-12 funding \u2013 KOMO News<\/a> \u2018Taylor Swift Tax\u2019 Won\u2019t Hit Just the Kelces – WSJ<\/a> Opinion: Wealth tax would help meet Lehigh County’s financial need fairly \u2013 The Morning Call<\/a> Wealth Taxes Would Hit the Young Hardest – WSJ<\/a> Ultrawealthy Seek Citizenship Abroad As Wealth Taxes Gain Traction – Business Insider<\/a> Opinion | Socialists think billionaires steal wealth – The Washington Post<\/a> <\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_cta title=”Want to learn more?” button_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/polling-and-research\/wealth-tax\/” button_text=”Visit our State and Federal Wealth Tax Tracker – Click Here ” admin_label=”State and Federal Wealth Tax Tracker CTA” _builder_version=”4.27.6″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#fc2f36″ custom_padding=”13px||18px|||” global_module=”17129″ global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_cta][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”off|off|off” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Logo & About” _builder_version=”4.22.1″ text_font=”||||||||” text_font_size=”16px” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/www.bhfs.com\/” link_option_url_new_window=”on” border_color_all=”#FFFFFF” border_style_all=”none” global_module=”6751″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n About Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”off|off|off” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Become a member text” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate-2\/” global_module=”5822″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n As we prepare for what promises to be a pivotal year for America, we’re asking you to consider becoming a member.<\/p>\n The need for fact-based reporting of issues important to family owned businesses<\/a> and protecting a lifetime of savings<\/a> has never been greater. Now more than ever, successful families<\/a> and family owned businesses<\/a> are under fire. That’s why Family Enterprise USA<\/a> is passionately working to increase the awareness of issues important to family owned businesses<\/a> built on hard work, while continuing to strengthen our presence on Capitol Hill. The issues we fight for or against with Congress in Washington DC include high income tax rates<\/a>, possible elimination of valuation discounts, increase in capital gains tax<\/a>, enactment of a wealth tax<\/a>, and the continued burden of the gift tax<\/a>, estate tax<\/a> and generation skipping tax<\/a>.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_button button_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate\/” button_text=”Become a Family Enterprise USA Member” button_alignment=”center” disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”Become FEUSA member button” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” global_module=”6503″ global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_button][et_pb_divider color=”#397389″ divider_style=”dotted” divider_weight=”2px” disabled_on=”on|on|on” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_video_slider disabled_on=”on|on|on” admin_label=”Video Slider Family Business Stories 2″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_module=”6670″ global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=y9VszpRjVDM” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=03T2VODneEg” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fHIxWaTwK64″ _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][et_pb_video_slider_item src=”https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=TI7P07GbNdU&t=27s” _builder_version=”4.19.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” show_image_overlay=”off”][\/et_pb_video_slider_item][\/et_pb_video_slider][et_pb_text disabled_on=”off|off|off” admin_label=”FEUSA Statement” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” link_option_url=”https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/donate-2\/” global_module=”5910″ saved_tabs=”all” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n Family Enterprise USA<\/a> promotes generationally<\/a> owned family business<\/a> creation, growth, viability, and sustainability by advocating for family businesses<\/a> and their lifetime of savings with Congress<\/a> in Washington DC.\u00a0 Since 2007, Family Enterprise USA<\/a> has represented and celebrated\u00a0all sizes, professions and industries of family-owned enterprises and multi-generational<\/a> employers. It is a bi-partisan 501.c3 organization.\u00a0Family foundations can donate.<\/a><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text disabled_on=”on|on|on” admin_label=”Hash tags & Tags” _builder_version=”4.27.6″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_module=”6498″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n #incometax #CapitalGainsTax #R&DExpensing #DontPunishSuccess #GrantorTrusts #StepUpinBasis #likeKindExchanges #AcceleratedDepreciation #EstateTax #Deathtax #wealthtax #taxLegislation #CongressionalCaucus #incometaxrates #repealestatetax #AdvocatingForFamilyBusinesses #FamilyOwnedBusiness #WomenOwnedBusiness @FamilyEnterpriseUSA #FamilyEnterpriseUSA #FEUSA<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Momentum for taxing the ultra-wealthy is building at every level of government in the last two weeks \u2013 from a progressive “Five & Dime” push in Congress to California’s high-stakes November ballot fight over a one-time 5% billionaire tax, alongside income-tax battles in Washington State, new luxury-property levies in New York City and Rhode Island, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":17891,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[48,92,115],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-family-businesses","category-multi-generational-business","category-wealth-tax"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17884"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17884\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17892,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17884\/revisions\/17892"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17891"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/familyenterpriseusa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
The New York Times has set up a page on their website tracking recent polling on the California wealth tax proposal.<\/p>\nFederal<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Dan Merica reports that growing public frustration with extreme wealth, highlighted by high-profile billionaires and rising inequality, is creating new political momentum for a federal wealth tax among progressives. Advocacy groups and some Democrats are pushing proposals like a \u201cFive & Dime\u201d tax on high-net-worth households, arguing it could raise significant revenue and address disparities in how the wealthy are taxed. Polling from the Pew Research Center suggests broad concern that wealthy individuals do not pay their fair share, though the idea still faces practical, legal, and political obstacles.<\/p>\nCalifornia<\/strong><\/h4>\n
In an interview with CNBC, Palihapitiya (founder and CEO of Social Capital) argued that California\u2019s wealth tax proposal would be ultimately harmful to economic activity and may eventually morph into a tax on Californians who are significantly less wealthy. He argues the tax may be a response to broader underlying issues such as ineffective governance and a general sense among many people that there is no meaningful path to financial success in the current economy. He noted that he will be staying in California and paying the tax if it takes effect.<\/p>\n
California\u2019s proposed wealth tax on the paper wealth of billionaires resident as of January 1, 2026 is prompting wealthy tech figures to claim they\u2019ve left the state, but they now face aggressive residency audits to test those claims. Sergey Brin, David Sacks, and Travis Kalanick all say they relocated shortly before the effective date, but advisers warn California\u2019s tax authorities will scrutinize not just days spent in\u2011state but property, family, and financial ties to argue they remain residents. Supporters expect the tax to raise about $100 billion to backfill federal healthcare cuts and are confident few billionaires truly severed connections in the brief window, while affected billionaires are funding competing ballot measures, organizing campaigns against the tax, and preparing constitutional and residency lawsuits that could drag on for years.<\/p>\n
California\u2019s proposed wealth tax highlights a major clash between populist anger at extreme wealth and organized opposition from Silicon Valley billionaires, led by Sergey Brin. Together, they have collectively committed at least $129 million to defeat the measure and placed spoiler initiatives on the ballot that could block any wealth tax. Supporters, including economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, see the tax as a first step toward limiting \u201coligarchic drift.\u201d Opponents, including Michael Moritz, Chamath Palihapitiya, and Governor Gavin Newsom, warn it will accelerate capital flight, invite repeat and broader wealth taxes, and deepen a rift within California\u2019s Democratic establishment.<\/p>\n
Alex Ossola and Jeanne Whalen\u00a0discuss the growing wave of state-level efforts to tax wealthy Americans, focusing on California\u2019s proposal. While supporters, including labor groups, argue the tax is necessary and popular amid rising concern over inequality, it faces significant opposition from business leaders, policymakers, and even some Democrats who warn of capital flight, legal challenges, and design flaws. The broader trend shows states more commonly pursuing high-income taxes rather than wealth taxes, with mixed evidence on economic impacts, while policymakers increasingly debate whether federal reforms are needed to address structural issues like tax avoidance strategies used by wealthy individuals.<\/p>\n
The California Post Editorial Board argues that the state\u2019s proposed wealth tax risks driving away wealthy innovators and undermining Silicon Valley\u2019s economic engine. The Board criticizes efforts to audit individuals who have left the state as overly aggressive and suggests the policy will discourage investment, entrepreneurship, and job creation while doing little to solve underlying fiscal issues like rising healthcare costs.<\/p>\n
Teresa Ghilarducci argues that California\u2019s proposed wealth tax is fundamentally a retirement\u2011security measure because it is designed to backfill Medi\u2011Cal funding lost under federal tax cuts, protecting Medicaid\u2019s role as the de facto long\u2011term\u2011care insurer for middle\u2011class retirees. She contrasts it with Proposition 42, branded as the \u201cRetirement and Personal Savings Protection Act,\u201d which would block new taxes on the types of assets billionaires hold and could kill the Billionaire Tax if both pass and Prop 42 receives more yes votes. She called Prop 42 a \u201cpoison pill\u201d that shields extreme wealth while threatening long\u2011term\u2011care financing.<\/p>\nNew York<\/strong><\/h4>\n
New York City\u2019s new tax on luxury second homes (the pied\u2011\u00e0\u2011terre tax) is being rolled out quickly to raise about $500 million, but real estate lawyers and industry groups say the rules are confusing and unfair. They argue the bare\u2011bones regulations leave major gray areas around residency proof, temporary vacancies, trusts, co\u2011op ownership, and tenant status, and worry co\u2011op buildings could be on the hook if individual owners don\u2019t pay. The tax will initially use different rates and valuation thresholds for houses versus co\u2011ops and condos, then shift after 2028 to a unified system for second homes valued at $5 million or more, but opponents say owners still lack clarity on how values will be set or how exemptions will work.<\/p>\nWashington<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Washington millionaire tax is now facing a likely repeal vote in November after a repeal initiative led by Brian Heywood\u2019s Let\u2019s Go Washington met the signature threshold. The tax, slated to take effect in 2028 and first due in 2029, is projected to apply to about 20,000 households and raise more than $3 billion per year starting in 2029. Supporters say it targets a small slice of top earners to fund state needs. Opponents argue it will hurt Washington\u2019s economic competitiveness and pave the way for a broader income tax, and they are also pursuing legal challenges claiming the levy is an illegal property tax.<\/p>\n
Opponents of Washington state\u2019s millionaire tax repeal, including Gov. Bob Ferguson (D) and legislative leaders, argue that scrapping the income tax while leaving new sales tax exemptions for items like diapers and hygiene products in place would severely impact in the budget and force \u201cdevastating\u201d K\u201112 cuts or other tax hikes. Brian Heywood counters that the problem is overspending rather than revenue and warns the tax will eventually be extended below the $1 million threshold to hit pensions and ordinary earners, while supporters insist there is no political support to broaden it beyond true million\u2011dollar incomes.<\/p>\nRhode Island<\/strong><\/h4>\n
James Freeman argued that Rhode Island\u2019s new \u201cTaylor Swift tax\u201d on high-value second homes will affect a broader group of residents and contribute to an already rising tax burden on the middle class. He said the policy, along with other tax increases such as higher gas taxes, real estate fees, and a new top income tax rate, reflects a broader approach that risks driving away investment and residents.<\/p>\nPennsylvania<\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n
Ettore Angelo argues that Controller Mark Pinsley\u2019s proposed intangible \u201cwealth tax\u201d in Lehigh County is a fair way to shift some of the county\u2019s financial burden from low\u2011wealth households to residents with substantial stock and other asset holdings. He criticized \u201ctrickle\u2011down\u201d economics and describes the hearing over the proposal as heated, but says the core question is whether struggling families or affluent asset\u2011owners should bear higher taxes as revenue shortfalls grow. Citing large gains in national wealth concentrated among the top 1%, Angelo argues that the U.S. has already experienced massive upward redistribution of wealth and that modest taxes on the rich are a necessary step toward reversing dangerous inequality, especially child poverty.<\/p>\nOther<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Dimitri Burshtein argues that wealth taxes, while gaining political traction, would ultimately harm younger generations by reducing capital investment needed for productivity and wage growth. He frames these proposals as a response to demographic pressures, aging populations and fewer workers supporting more retirees, which are straining public finances and driving governments to seek new revenue sources. Drawing on international experience, he argued thar wealth taxes often lead to capital flight and disappointing revenues, while undermining long-term economic growth. Instead, he advocates structural reforms such as adjusting retirement systems and favoring consumption-based taxes, warning that wealth taxes shift fiscal burdens onto younger and future generations while weakening the economic foundation they depend on.<\/p>\n
As wealth taxes gain momentum in the US, wealthy Americans are increasingly treating foreign citizenship and residency as an insurance policy against future tax increases. The article notes that California\u2019s wealth tax proposal has already prompted some to shift assets or relocate. Others are seeking \u201cgolden passports\u201d or visas by making large investments abroad. Advisors such as David Lesperance say clients first pursue lineage-based citizenship in countries where they have ancestral ties, with second or third passports providing optional escape routes even if they never ultimately leave the US.<\/p>\n
Marian Tupy, a fellow at the CATO Institute, argued that socialist critiques of billionaires rely on an outdated belief that wealth is \u201ctaken\u201d rather than created. He argued that billionaires generate wealth by organizing resources in ways that benefit consumers, workers, and society, and that profits reflect this value creation rather than exploitation. Tupy warns that wealth taxes would discourage innovation, prompt capital flight, and reduce economic growth. He said that taxing billionaire wealth would ultimately harm the broader public by diminishing incentives to create new businesses, technologies, and jobs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/strong>Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck is a unique law firm. Walk into any of our offices and you\u2019ll immediately recognize a different type of energy. Complacency doesn\u2019t have a place here. Flexibility and inspiration do.\u00a0Our culture and enthusiasm allow our attorneys, policy consultants and legal staff to stay ahead of our clients\u2019 needs and provide them with the resources they require to meet their business objectives.<\/p>\nWe hope you’ve enjoyed this article. While you’re here, we have a small favor to ask…<\/em><\/h4>\n
\n
\n